Legal Opinion

Wheeler v. Fronhoff

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 9, 1925No. 3001PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

* Writ of error granted April 29, 1925. The judgment complained of is not erroneous, unless the legal effect of B. Fronhoff's agreement, set out in the statement above, was to transfer to appellants an interest in the cause of action in the subject-matter of the suit; for if that was not the effect of that agreement, appellants had no cause of action against H. Fronhoff, and therefore no right to intervene in the pending suit for the purpose of prosecuting it against him on their own account.

The language of the agreement is not like that used in Ry. Co. v. Vaughan, 16 Tex. Civ. App. 403, 40…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. GintherTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
  3. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. VaughanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  4. Hanna v. Island Coal Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Trinity County Lumber Co. v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Carroll v. HuntTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Paxton v. First State Bank of TatumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Bryan & Amidei v. LawCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  4. Strickland v. SellersDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1948
  5. Travelers Fire Ins. Co. v. SteinmannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API