Durant v. Department of Education
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs seek mandamus to compel defendants to fund the Fitzgerald Public Schools in the same proportion those schools were funded in fiscal year 1978-1979, pursuant to the so-called Headlee Amendment, Const 1963, art 9, §§ 25-34.
Plaintiffs claim that the state has provided for a smaller percentage of operating revenues for general public education in the Fitzgerald Public Schools, in addition to special education and driver education, than is required under the Headlee Amendment. Defendants deny that less money has been provided and dispute plaintiffs’ standing to bring this suit. This…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Rostker v. GoldbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Dation v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Waterford School District v. State Board of EducationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Deziel v. Difco Laboratories. Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Board of County Road Commissioners v. State Highway CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Durant v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
- Durant v. Department of EducationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
- Wayne County Chief Executive v. GovernorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Durant v. Department of EducationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Waterford Sch. Dist. v. BD. OF EDUC.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.