Simmons v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
This is a conviction for burglary. The facts show that appellant is under 13 years of age, and with reasonable accuracy that he was born on the 12th of September, 1894. Appellant contends that the court was in error in not submitting the law in regard to accomplice’s testimony. The burglary insisted upon is shown to have been committed by entering a barn, and taking from it a new set of harness, which the alleged owner stated cost him $26. It may be important to state here, that Whitfield testified his harness was new, and that he found it some eight or ten days…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. McDermottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- O'Connor v. VineyardTexas Supreme Court · 1898
- Bob v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
- G. W. and E. Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
- Linhart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. DowlingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
- Samuel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Ripley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Moree v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944
- Towery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.