Legal Opinion

Oscar Andiarena v. United States

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 26, 1992No. 91-1943PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Per curiam

Oscar Andiarena (petitioner) appeals pro se from the denial of his second petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate his sentence. The district court dismissed the petition as an “abuse of the writ” pursuant to McCleskey v. Zant, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 1454, 113 L.Ed.2d 517 (1991). We affirm.

I

In 1985, petitioner was convicted of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and thereafter was sentenced to a 30-year prison term. On appeal, represented by new counsel, he cited as error (1) the district court’s admission into evidence of prior bad acts, (2) the court reporter’s failure to…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. United States v. BarrettCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  2. United States v. Calvin DyessCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  3. United States v. Abraham FloresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  4. Oakes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  5. Glover v. Cain & IeyoubCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API