Legal Opinion

Gioia v. Gioia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 9, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The summons and complaint in this action were served on defendant who understood their contents and destroyed the papers. Defendant is guilty of laches since she did not make this motion until about thirteen months after the final decree was entered. It is clear that defendant has not outlined a meritorious defense to plaintiff’s action. If the fact be that she fraudulently participated in bringing about a judgment of divorce against herself in plaintiff’s favor, she is barred thereby.from the relief she now seeks, (Kinnier v. Kinnier, 53 Barb. 454; affd., 45 N. Y. 535; *374Karren v. Karren, 25…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kinnier v. . KinnierNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Karren v. KarrenUtah Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Kinnier v. KinnierNew York Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Imbrici v. Madison Avenue Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Krupinski v. KrupinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  3. Coleman v. ColemanNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Bigelow v. BigelowNew York Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API