Legal Opinion
Imbrici v. Madison Avenue Realty Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 27, 1950PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHammeb, J.
In this action to recover alleged excess rent, defendant moves for summary judgment. The plaintiff opposes, claiming first, that the arbitration had herein was not filed or confirmed; second, the declaration of public policy involved in the statutes; and third, that the court is bound by the controlling cases on the doctrine of law of the case.
At the outset, in Matter of Heidelberger (Cooper) (300 N. Y. 502) there was no filing or confirmation of the award at the time the motion to vacate was made. Copy of the award had been handed to the tenant’s attorney on the day the award was made.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. DuelSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Walker v. GerliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Hornstein v. PodwitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Monteith Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wagner v. BaronSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- Madison Avenue Realty Corp. v. ImbriciCity of New York Municipal Court · 1950
- Bigelow v. BigelowNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- Joe Elton Nixon v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2021
- Jones v. WithrowRoanoke County Circuit Court · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.