Baldwin v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Chief Judge.
The question presented is whether revocation of probation on the basis of an uncharged violation, to which no objection was entered at the probation revocation hearing, is reviewable by an appellate court.
I
On November 23, 1982, Hugh Hartman Baldwin, Jr. was found guilty in the Circuit Court for Cecil County of three violations of Maryland Code (1957, 1987 Repl.Vol.), Article 27, § 286, namely:
Count 5: possession of phencyclidine with intent to distribute;
Count 7: possession of equipment adopted for the production and sale of controlled dangerous substances; and
Count 8:…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Black v. RomanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Chase v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Patuxent Institution Board of Review v. HancockCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Meadows v. SettlesSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
- Lupfer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Brookman & Carnes v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Patuxent Institution Board of Review v. HancockCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993