Legal Opinion

Guaranteed Rate, Inc. v. Faust

District Court, S.D. California

Decided September 19, 2024No. 3:24-cv-00434Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 GUARANTEED RATE, INC., Case No.: 3:24-cv-00434-W-DEB 15 Claimant, ORDER GRANTING CLAIMANT’S 16 v. PETITION FOR ORDER COMPELLING ARBITRATION 17 RICHARD M. FAUST, [DOC. 1] 18 Respondent. 19 20 Pending before the Court is Claimant Guaranteed Rate, Inc.’s (“GRI”) petition 21 seeking an Order Compelling Respondent Richard M. Foust to arbitration for the above- 22 entitled action. ([Doc. 1], Pet. for Order Compelling Arbitration (“Pet.”).) The Court 23 decides the matter on the papers submitted and without…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Michael Ashbey v. Archstone Property ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. Belsito Communications, Inc. v. DeckerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  4. Samaniego v. Empire Today, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Espejo v. Southern California Permanente Medical GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API