Legal Opinion

In Re Nomination Petition of Farnese

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 2011No. 13 EAP 2008Published

1Opinion of the Court

17 A.3d 357 (2011)

In re Nomination Petition of Lawrence M. FARNESE, Jr., for the Democratic Nomination for Senator in the General Assembly for the First Senatorial District in the Primary of April 22, 2008

Appeal of Keith Olkowski and Theresa A. Paylor.

No. 13 EAP 2008.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued April 15, 2009.

Decided March 29, 2011.

Samuel C. Stretton, Law Office of Samuel C. Stretton, West Chester, for Keith Olkowski.

David J. Montgomery, Clifford B. Levine, Pittsburgh, Thorp Reed & Armstrong, LLP, for Lawrence M. Farnese, Jr.

Louis Lawrence Boyle, PA Department of State, for…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Harper v. Virginia Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Bullock v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Lubin v. PanishSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. P.J.S. v. Pennsylvania State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API