Legal Opinion

State v. Cunningham

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 25, 2019No. A166263PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

523 Submitted August 16; in Case No. 16CR73257, remanded for resentencing, otherwise affirmed; in Case No. 17CR04476, remanded for resentencing, otherwise affirmed; in Case No. 16CR78536, affirmed September 25, 2019 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JAMES HERBERT CUNNINGHAM, Defendant-Appellant. Clatsop County Circuit Court 16CR73257, 16CR78536, 17CR04476; A166263 (Control), A166268, A166269, A167799

451 P3d 268

Defendant appeals three judgments of conviction, arguing that the trial court plainly erred in imposing post-prison supervision terms that were longer than permitted by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. JuryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. State v. KilgoreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. State v. GlazierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. State v. JerscheidCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  2. State v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. State v. ValentiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  4. State v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API