Legal Opinion

Buckley v. Page

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided February 18, 1970No. A-15720PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an original proceeding on the “Application of John Walter Buckley for Post Conviction Relief” alleging that his plea of guilty was involuntary and that the sentence resulting therefrom was imposed in violation of petitioner’s constitutional rights. Oklahoma does not have a “post-conviction relief” statute as has been adopted in other states and as recommended by the American Bar Association. But since petitioner’s application attacks the legality of his imprisonment, it will be considered in the nature of habeas corpus.

Petitioner was charged in the District Court of Oklahoma County…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. State v. SmithCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1946
  3. Ward v. PageDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1965
  4. Application of KinnisonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1959
  5. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chatman v. PageCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1971
  2. Bumpus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
  3. Hayes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1972
  4. Buckley v. PageCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1970
  5. Bumpus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API