Legal Opinion

Woods v. Tate

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 23, 1948No. 12390PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCORD, Circuit Judge.

This action is brought for injunctive relief, restitution and damages pursuant to Section 205(a) and (e) of the Emergency Price Control Act, as amended, for an alleged violation of the Rent Regulations for Housing, Title 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 925(a) and (e) ; 10 F.R. 3436.

The complaint alleged that defendant, Mary Tate, was the owner of certain housing accommodations at Houston, Texas, within the Houston Defense-Rental Area, and that such accommodations were sub-' ject to the Rent Regulations for Housing; that defendant had violated and was continuing to violate the Act…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Banco De Espana v. Federal Reserve Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  3. Bowles v. Glick Bros. Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
  4. Wynne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. Hagen v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. FogaleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
  2. Baldwin v. SchmidtDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1952
  3. Kolar v. Woods, Housing ExpediterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  4. Mrs. W.K. Nicholson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
  5. United States v. PetersonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API