Legal Opinion
United States v. Fogaley
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 7, 1951No. 4235_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Chief Judge.
On May 25, 1950, the United States commenced this action against the Fogaleys alleging violations of § 4 of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 901 et seq., and of § 206(a) of the Housing and Rent Act of 1947, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1881 et seq., and the Controlled Housing Rent Regulation, as amended, 12 F.R. 4331, 13 F.R. 1861, and seeking damages, injunc-tive relief; and an order of restitution; At the trial the United States announced that it would not seek recovery of damages. The trial court found that the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Blood v. FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
- Ebeling v. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
- Co-Efficient Foundation, Inc. v. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Peñagarícano v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1960
- Howard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- Camunas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1954
- General Motors Corp. v. Oklahoma County Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.