Legal Opinion

Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Van Hollen

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided May 23, 2014No. 13-cv-465-wmcPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

WILLIAM M. CONLEY, District Judge.

In this action, plaintiffs Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin, Inc.; Susan Pfleger, M.D., a Planned Parenthood physician; Kathy King, M.D., Planned Parenthood’s Medical Director; and Milwaukee Women’s Medical Services d/b/a Affiliated Medical Services assert various constitutional challenges to Section 1 of 2013 Wisconsin Act 37 (“the Act”) against defendants, the Attorney General of the State of Wisconsin, the Dane County District Attorney, the Secretary of the Department of Safety and Professional Services and members of the Medical Examining…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Carter v. Carter Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Washington Ex Rel. Seattle Title Trust Co. v. RobergeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Van HollenDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2015
  2. Capital Care Network of Toledo v. Dept. of Health (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Capital Care Network of Toledo v. Dept. of Health (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Capital Care Network of Toledo v. Dept. of Health (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Miller v. CooperDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API