Capital Care Network of Toledo v. Dept. of Health (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
1Concurrence · FrenchFrench, J.
{¶ 36} I agree with the majority that appellant, Ohio Department of Health ("ODH"), lawfully revoked the operating license of appellee, Capital Care Network of Toledo ("Capital Care"), because Capital Care did not have a transfer agreement with a hospital as required by Ohio Adm.Code 3701-83-19(E). As stated by the majority, we need not address the constitutionality of R.C. 3702.303, 3702.304, and 3727.60, because the administrative rule provided an alternative and independent basis for ODH to revoke Capital Care's license.
{¶ 37} I write separately, however, to address the dissent's…
Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence · O'Neill.
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.