Legal Opinion

Captain Charles v. Gridley Camp No. 104 v. Board of Supervisors

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 29, 1929No. Docket No. 3823PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

This cause is before us upon an original application for a writ of mandate by the above-named petitioners praying for an order of this court, directed to the respondents, commanding them to admit the petitioners to the use and occupation of a certain memorial building situate at Gridley, in the county of Butte.

The record before us shows that the county of Butte has erected four memorial buildings for the use of patriotic associations, one of said buildings being located in each of the following cities: Oroville, Chico, Paradise and Gridley. The record further shows that prior to the erection…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Allied Architects' Ass'n of Los Angeles v. PayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. County of Los Angeles v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  3. Amusement Syndicate Co. v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Colwell v. City of Great FallsMontana Supreme Court · 1945
  2. California School Employees Ass'n v. Sequoia Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Crowley v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Hofacker v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Opinion No. (1999), California Attorney General Reports1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API