Legal Opinion

Exchange Bank & Trust Co. v. Kidwell Construction Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1971No. B-2651PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

The application for writ of error in this case is refused with the notation “no re versible error”. The court of civil appeals at 463 S.W.2d 465, construed two sections of the Uniform Commercial Code; Sec. 4.-406, Tex.Bus. & Com.Code, and Sec. 3.406, Tex.Bus. & Com.Code. As to the former, the court of civil appeals held that the trial court’s finding that the bank failed to exercise ordinary care in paying certain forged checks was supported by some evidence. The court therefore held that the depositor was not precluded from asserting a claim based upon the forgeries under Sec. 4.406(b). Our…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Exchange Bank & Trust Co. v. Kidwell Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1971

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ray v. Farmers' State Bank of HartTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Taylor v. Equitable Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  3. Schoenfelder v. Arizona BankArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Frost National Bank v. Nicholas & BarreraCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. Hanover Ins. Companies v. Brotherhood State BankDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API