Martin v. HESS CARTAGE CO.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLevin, P. J.
This action was dismissed with prejudice upon a finding by the trial court that the plaintiffs had not responded to an interrogatory in accordance with an earlier order of the court. We reverse and remand for trial because the earlier order requiring the response to the interrogatory did not provide that the information sought could be furnished only in the manner that the court, at the time of dismissal, found was required, and the record does not show that the construction placed by the court on its earlier order was communicated by the court to the plaintiffs or their lawyer before the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Oaks v. RojcewiczAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
- Krim v. OsborneMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- Dann v. Compagnie Generale Trans-Atlantique Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 1939
- White Pine Copper Co. v. Continental Insurance Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1958
3Cited by3 opinions
- Deyo v. KilbourneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- North v. Department of Mental HealthMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Deyo v. KilbourneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978