Legal Opinion

Bonner v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1916No. Docket No. 79PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Ingham; Collingwood, J. Case by Alfred Bonner against the Grand Trunk Western Railway Company, a corporation, for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

Between 4 and 5 o’clock on the afternoon of January 17, 1914, plaintiff, while on his way south to a nearby grocery store, went upon defendant’s double main track railroad, at its right-angled intersection with Washington avenue, which runs north and south through the city of Lansing, just as the crossing gates were being lowered, and stood between the rails of the north, or west-bound, track, awaiting the passage into the passenger station immediately to the east, of defendant’s No. 8 fast Pullman express train from the west. While so standing he was struck and injured by a freight train of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railroad v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Knickerbocker v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Freeman v. Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Putt v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Berry v. Harbor Springs Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wight v. H. G. Christman Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Holstine v. Director General of RailroadsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API