Legal Opinion

Faribault Woolen Mill Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 9, 1979No. 49105PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHEN L. MAXWELL, Justice. *

Plaintiff, Faribault Woolen Mill Co., brought suit under the Carmack Amendment to the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 20(11) (1978), 1 against the defendant rail carriers to recover for a water-damaged shipment of “greasy wool” which defendants transported. The case was tried to the court without a jury. The trial court ruled alternatively (1) that plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of liability under the Carmack Amendment, and (2) that, assuming arguendo, that plaintiff did establish a prima facie case, defendants had rebutted the case.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Elmore & StahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Schnell v. the VallescuraSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Northwestern Marble & Tile Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. Reider v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  5. Blue Bird Food Products Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American National Fire Insurance Company v. Yellow Freight Systems, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  2. American National Fire Insurance v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API