Legal Opinion

Jimenez v. Maloney

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided February 23, 1983No. 04-81-00355-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BUTTS, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment. Appellant brought suit against his attorneys, appellees, alleging legal malpractice. The trial court granted summary judgment that the suit was barred by the statute of limitations. We affirm.

Appellant’s pro se contentions assert (1) that parole status suffices for imprisonment within the meaning of Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat. Ann. art. 5535 (Vernon 1958), and (2) that the discovery rule applies to legal malpractice.

Pat Maloney and Sylvan R. Alter represented appellant as court-appointed counsel in a prosecution for murder with malice…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Adler v. Beverly Hills HospitalCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. McClung v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Rice v. ForestierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. Smith v. KnightTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Blum v. ElkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ellis D. Burrell v. Jimmy Newsome, Chief of Police, Port Arthur Police Dept.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  2. Cannon v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Willis v. Maverick, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1986
  4. Johnny R. Glover v. R.C. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  5. Sutherland v. Caballero, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API