Legal Opinion

Fritz v. Town of Clermont

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 1973No. 1171A229PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoffman, C.J.

This appeal is from a judgment of the trial court against the plaintiffs-appellants Walter E. Fritz and Ramona J. Fritz on their amended complaint appealing a sewer construction assessment. The primary issue here presented is whether a 32.7 acre tract of land already receiving sewer service is specially benefited by the construction of “trunk and main” sewers within a designated assessment area.

The instant appeal turns upon the interpretation to be given to Acts 1967, ch. 128, as found in IC 1971, 19-2-7-1 to 19-2-7-20, Ind. Ann. Stat. §§ 48-3948 to 48-3967 (Burns Cum. Supp. 1972). We will…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fritz v. Board of TrusteesIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MumfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Hubenthal v. CrainIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Brewster-Mill Park Realty, Inc. v. Town BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  5. Indiano v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gordy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
  2. City of Indianapolis v. NickelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. City of South Bend v. Brooksfield FarmIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Slebodnik v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. City of South Bend v. Brooksfield FarmIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API