Legal Opinion

Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Mumford

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1935No. 25,356PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFansler, J.

—This is an appeal from a judgment establishing a levee in Gibson and Posey counties, under sections 9573 to 9587, inclusive, Burns 1926. The proceedings involve about 60,000 acres of land affected by the overflow of the Wabash, White, and Patoka rivers. The appellant railroads maintain tracks constructed on embankments and bridges across the Wabash river in the affected area. The other appellants are affected landowners.

The original petition was referred to drainage commissioners, who filed a preliminary report conforming to the statute, against which no remonstrances were filed. It was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Leovy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Lipes v. HandIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Chicago & Erie Railroad v. LuddingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Cubbins v. Mississippi River CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Taylor v. StrayerIndiana Supreme Court · 1906

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State, Etc. v. TolliverIndiana Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Book v. BOARD OF FLOOD CONTROL COMRS. ETC.Indiana Supreme Court · 1959
  3. State v. AhausIndiana Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Martin v. Simplimatic Engineering Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. State v. SMITH ET UX.Indiana Supreme Court · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API