Legal Opinion

Darst v. Fort Dodge, Des Moines & Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 15, 1922PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Arthur, J.'

I. Facts showing the situation, sufficient to present the claimed errors, are substantially as follows:

■ Plaintiff owned a farm containing 240 acres. The highway in question ran east and west along the south side of one 80 of said farm. The highway was a main-traveled road between Fort Dodge and Lehigh, Iowa, and was a part of the highway known as the “Boone Road.” This highway turned southward just shortly before it reached the extreme eastern point of plaintiff’s land. Plaintiff’s farm buildings fronted and abutted upon this *1147highway, being’ located near the southeast corner of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lincoln v. ClaflinSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Richmond v. Dubuque & Sioux City R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  3. Richards v. Citizens Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  4. Frazer v. Bigelow Carpet Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  5. Black v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Longstreet v. Town of SharonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  2. Cory v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  3. Schoonover v. FlemingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
  4. Cutler v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
  5. Campbell v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API