Legal Opinion

United States v. Ramos

District Court, S.D. California

Decided June 3, 2016No. Case No.: 16cr467 JMPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE AS FRUIT OF AN ILLEGAL SEARCH

JEFFREY T. MILLER, United States District Judge

This case presents the question whether the recent Supreme Court case of Riley v. California, — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 2473, 189 L.Ed.2d 430 (2014), generally requiring law enforcement to obtain a search warrant before accessing contents of a cell phone taken from an arrestee, applies to the manual border search of a cell phone taken from a drug courier following his arrest. Defendant, Clemente Ramos, was arrested at the Otay Mesa Port of Entry and charged with…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Hamza KolsuzCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. Miguel CanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. MendezDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2017
  4. United States v. CanoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2016
  5. United States v. Molina-IsidoroDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API