Legal Opinion
United States v. Cano
District Court, S.D. California
Decided November 23, 2016No. Case No.: 16-cr-01770-BTMPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SUPPRESS AND MOTION FOR RETURN OF PROPERTY
Barry Ted Moskowitz, Chief Judge, United States District Court
Presently before the Court are Defendant’s motion to suppress and motion for return of property. The Court held an evidentiary hearing on these matters on October 25, 26 and 31, 2016. For the reasons discussed below, Defendant’s motions are DENIED.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
On July 25, 2016 at approximately 6:30 a.m., Defendant, Miguel Angel Cano, applied for entry to the United States at the San Ysidro Port of Entry (“POE”). A Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) officer…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Ashcroft v. al-KiddSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Miguel CanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020