Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Salley v. McCoy

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 9, 1936No. 14372Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Bonham

(concurring) : I concur that this Court is bound by its decision in the case of Holt v. Calhoun et al., 175 S. C., 381, 179 S. E., 501. With that case still of force, I am constrained by the opinion declared in it to concur in Mr. Justice Baker’s opinion in the present case.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Holt v. CalhounSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935