Legal Opinion
Saxton v. County of Sonoma
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 6, 2023No. 3:21-cv-09499Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KATRINA MCGINNIS, Case No. 22-cv-06632-SI 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 9 v. MOTION TO DISMISS 10 COUNTY OF SONOMA, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 31 11 Defendants. 12 13 14 Defendant County of Sonoma’s motion to dismiss the second amended complaint was 15 scheduled for a hearing on June 2, 2023. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court determined 16 that the matter is appropriate for resolution without oral argument and VACATED the hearing. For 17 the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the County’s motion…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Connick v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Hodgers-Durgin v. De La VinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Smith v. City of FontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Rucker v. Harford CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.