Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Tucker v. Ernst & Young, LLP

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 13, 2014No. 1121048Published

1ConcurrenceMurdock, Justice

The main opinion disclaims agreement with the understanding and application of various affirmative defenses upon which the arbitrators based their ruling in favor of Ernst & Young, LLP (“E & Y’). See, e.g., 159 So.3d at 1268 n. 5. This disclaimer is made for good reason. I believe the arbitrators misunderstood and misapplied critical legal principles regarding the imputation of an agent’s knowledge or actions to a principal. Without the erroneous imputations made by the arbitrators, the affirmative defenses upon which the arbitrators based their ruling would not have been available in this…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Hall Street Associates, L. L. C. v. Mattel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Oxford Health Plans LLC v. SutterSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API