Rakocy v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
President Judge Crumlish, Jr.,
A Workmens Compensation Appeal Board (Board) order upheld a referees decision to deny Thomas M. Rakocy specific loss benefits (right eye).1 We affirm.2
Rakocy, a laborer for M. Gordon & Sons, Inc., was injured when debris from a sandblasting hose entered his right eye. Thereafter, he developed ocular herpes resulting in scarring of the eye.
Rakocy contends on appeal that his blurred vision—the result of sunlight diffusing through the scars in his eye—is undetectable in an examination under normal doctors office conditions. Thus, he asserts that *627the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Estate of McGovern v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Hoffman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Tesco Tank Center, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Bauer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mauger & Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991