Legal Opinion

Rakocy v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 28, 1988No. Appeal, No. 1481 C.D. 1987PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

President Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

A Workmens Compensation Appeal Board (Board) order upheld a referees decision to deny Thomas M. Rakocy specific loss benefits (right eye).1 We affirm.2

Rakocy, a laborer for M. Gordon & Sons, Inc., was injured when debris from a sandblasting hose entered his right eye. Thereafter, he developed ocular herpes resulting in scarring of the eye.

Rakocy contends on appeal that his blurred vision—the result of sunlight diffusing through the scars in his eye—is undetectable in an examination under normal doctors office conditions. Thus, he asserts that *627the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Estate of McGovern v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Hoffman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Tesco Tank Center, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Bauer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mauger & Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API