Legal Opinion

Griest v. STATE UNIV. & DICKINSON SCHOOL

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 4, 2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BENDER, J.:

11 1 Lester Griest appeals from the order entered on June 7, 2005, that granted the summary judgment motion filed by Pennsylvania State University (PSU) and Dickinson School of Law (DSL) (collectively Appellees) in a suit filed by Mr. Griest wherein he sought damages from Appel-lees for age discrimination in employment. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

¶ 2 We begin with a brief recitation of the facts that the parties agree are not in dispute. Mr. Griest was an employee of DSL as the Director of the Plants and Grounds Department. Shortly before the merger of DSL and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strickland v. University of ScrantonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Thomas Long v. Sears Roebuck & Company Sears Merchandise Group. Thomas G. LongCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  3. John R. Wastak v. Lehigh Valley Health NetworkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  4. Davis v. Government Employees InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Millard v. OsborneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Romero v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Romero v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API