Legal Opinion

State v. Austin

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 2007No. Nos. 20060508, 20060541, 20060566PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Chief Justice:

T1 The defendants in these consolidated cases were tried and convicted of separate offenses. They each assert, however, that the reasonable doubt jury instruction used at their trials violated the standard set forth by this court in State v. Reyes, 2005 UT 33, 116 P.3d 305, because all the instructions included the statement that the State's evidence must "eliminate all reasonable doubt." We conclude that the instructions were permissible because the instructions, in their entirety, adequately conveyed to the jury the principle of reasonable doubt.

BACKGROUND

12 At his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Victor v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. State v. RobertsonUtah Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. CruzUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. ReyesUtah Supreme Court · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
  2. State v. CrowleyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  3. State v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  4. State v. SchroederCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API