State v. Austin
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DURHAM, Chief Justice:
T1 The defendants in these consolidated cases were tried and convicted of separate offenses. They each assert, however, that the reasonable doubt jury instruction used at their trials violated the standard set forth by this court in State v. Reyes, 2005 UT 33, 116 P.3d 305, because all the instructions included the statement that the State's evidence must "eliminate all reasonable doubt." We conclude that the instructions were permissible because the instructions, in their entirety, adequately conveyed to the jury the principle of reasonable doubt.
BACKGROUND
12 At his…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Victor v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- State v. RobertsonUtah Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. CruzUtah Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. ReyesUtah Supreme Court · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
- State v. CrowleyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
- State v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
- State v. SchroederCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023