Legal Opinion

Koehl v. Mirza

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 17, 2009PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order modified, without costs, by reinstating plaintiffs claims under 42 USC § 1983 and remitting the case to Supreme Court, Clinton County, for further proceedings on those claims, and, as so modified, affirmed (see Haywood v Drown, 556 US —, 129 S Ct 2108 [2009], on remand 13 NY3d 760 [2009]).

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Haywood v. DrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Haywood v. DrownNew York Court of Appeals · 2009

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Upsher v. RamineniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011