Legal Opinion
Porter v. Hollander
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided July 1, 1980No. Civ. A. 79-184PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, District Judge.
In this action, plaintiff Barbara Porter (“plaintiff” or “Porter”) seeks specific performance of a written contract in which defendants Morton and Ruth Hollander (“defendants”) agreed to purchase and plaintiff agreed to sell a condominium unit in Bethany Beach, Delaware. The defendants filed a counterclaim for specific performance of the contract, engendering a dispute between the parties as to what performance is required under the contract. Jurisdiction is conferred by 28 U.S.C. § 1332. 1 The defendants have moved for summary judgment which, for the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Weinberger v. WiesenfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Sondra L. McKenna and James R. McKenna v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cropper v. Rego Distribution Center, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1982
- Tower House Condominium, Inc. v. MillmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Franchetti v. Intercole Automation, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1981
- Honeycutt v. KendallDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1982
- Chrisco v. ShafranDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.