Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Gardiner

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 4, 2001No. [No. 4, October Term, 1950.]PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

This is an appeal by Paul C. Robinson and Charles Haas, plaintiffs below, appellants here, from a judgment for costs rendered against them after demurrer, filed by appellees, was sustained to their first amended declaration. The trial judge refused to allow appellants to file a second amended declaration.

This first amended declaration contained two counts, one in contract and the other in tort and, for the purposes of this case, made the following declarations. The plaintiffs are engaged as a co-partnership in the lumber business. For a long time, prior to October 9th, 1945, defendant, George…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
  2. Thomson v. GortnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1891
  3. HW Kastor & Sons Adv. Co. v. Grove LaboratoriesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1945
  4. Martz v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  5. Reiser Co. v. Baltimore Radio Show, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Rosenthal v. National Produce Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Mogavero v. SilversteinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. Strickler Engineering Corp. v. Seminar, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  4. County Commissioners for Carroll County v. Forty West Builders, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  5. Quillen v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API