Legal Opinion

State v. Brady

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided February 24, 1984No. 83-474-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGartzke, P.J.

James Brady is charged with theft by fraud, sec. 943.20(1) (d), Stats. He previously had been arrested to secure his presence as a witness in another matter, a John Doe proceeding. The state appeals from an order suppressing evidence resulting from that arrest. The issues are: (1) may a John Doe judge issue a material witness warrant under sec. 969.01(3), Stats.; (2) if not, did defendant’s arrest on such a warrant violate his right against unreasonable search and seizure; and (3) does the exclusionary rule apply to the violation. We hold that the warrant was invalid, the arrest was unlawful…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Taylor v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Barry v. United States Ex Rel. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. CummingsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. BradyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. Jose Alberto Reyes FuerteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State v. SchoberCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  5. Opinion No. Oag 51-87, (1987), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API