Legal Opinion

State v. Air Conditioning Engineers, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 15, 1965No. 1 Div. 194PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARWOOD, Justice.

The sole question involved in this review is whether an air conditioning contractor must pay a sales tax only upon the value of the sheet metal he uses in constructing a completed air conditioning duct system, or is the tax to be computed upon the value of the parts and components in their changed state after the contractor has bent, crimped, and partially shaped the sheet metal as component parts of the finished duct system, which partially finished parts are later taken to the job site where they are further shaped, bent, fitted, ,and connected into the finished duct system…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Louisville v. Ewing Von-Allmen Dairy Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  2. Montgomery Aviation Corp. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  3. Armature Exchange, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1939
  4. Cullum v. StevensDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1942
  5. Charles Marchand Co. v. HigginsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Disco Aluminum Products Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  2. State v. AckerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970
  3. Ex Parte Morrison Food Service of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. White v. Campbell & Associates, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  5. Ex Parte Campbell & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API