Legal Opinion

Morateck v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1967PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

The respondent Milwaukee Auto argues that it is entitled to full subrogation by virtue of the provisions in the insurance policy. We conclude, however, that the terms of that policy are irrelevant to this appeal. The 1968 case, which was appealed to this court and which would have resulted in this court’s construction of the provisions of Milwaukee Auto’s uninsured motorists policy, was abandoned by the parties and the policy provisions are not before us. We are limited in this appeal to construing the order of October 10, 1963, following the arbitration hearing, which provided that Milwaukee…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Garrity v. Rural Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GelineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Collicott v. Economy Fire & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Nearhoof v. International Sales-Rentals Leasing Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API