Legal Opinion
Elemary v. Philipp Holzmann A.G.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 6, 2008No. Civil Action 07-654 (RCL)PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, District Judge.
Defendants Bill L. Harbert, Sr. (“Har-bert”), Harbert International Establishment, Inc., Billy Harbert, Jr., and B.L. Harbert International, LLC moved to transfer venue to the Northern District of Alabama. This Court subsequently ruled [30] on two motions to dismiss, and only Harbert remains a defendant in this action. Hence, the Court will evaluate the present motion as applied to the claims still pending against him. The Court has considered defendants’ motion [11], plaintiffs opposition thereto [18], defendants’ reply [20], and the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Pain v. United Technologies Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Sheffer v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Otay Mesa Property L.P. v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Kazenercom Too v. Turan Petroleum, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- PCH Mut. Ins. Co., Inc. v. CASUALTY & SUR., INC.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Essroc Cement Corp. v. CTI/D.C., Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.