MacMahon v. Hudd
Oregon Supreme Court
From Tillamook: William Galloway, Judge. This is an action of ejectment by Lois 0. MacMahon against Robert S. Hull. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals. Respondent files motion to dismiss appeal. Statement by Mr. Justice McBride. . This is an action of ejectment to recover lands in Tilla-mook County. Defendant denies plaintiff’s title and affirmatively alleges title in his lessor by a deed from the sheriff on a sale for taxes.
Read the full summary
From Tillamook: William Galloway, Judge. This is an action of ejectment by Lois 0. MacMahon against Robert S. Hull. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals. Respondent files motion to dismiss appeal. Statement by Mr. Justice McBride. . This is an action of ejectment to recover lands in Tilla-mook County. Defendant denies plaintiff’s title and affirmatively alleges title in his lessor by a deed from the sheriff on a sale for taxes. Upon the trial a jury was waived,, and the court took the case under advisement and in vacation made findings and rendered judgment for defendant.…
1Opinion
Decided August 13, 1912.
Rehearing denied October 15, 1912.
On the Merits.
(126 Pac. 3.)
At the next term of the court, held by Hon. Geo. H. Burnett, it appears from the record that both parties appeared, and the motion was argued, submitted, and a new trial granted, which resulted in a verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Nothing was done by defendant until the succeeding term, when a motion was made to set aside the order of Judge Burnett, granting a new trial, and the judgment rendered pursuant to such trial, for the reason that the court had no jurisdiction to grant such new trial, and that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Deering v. QuiveyOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- Brand v. BakerOregon Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by1 opinion
- MacMahon v. HuddOregon Supreme Court · 1912