Abbott v. National Bank of Commerce of Tulsa
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentBusby, J.
I am unable to concur in the legal reasoning by which a majority of my associates arrive at the conclusion announced in this case.
It is undisputed in this case that notice of acceptance of the instrument herein involved (whether it be a “mere offer of guaranty” oí-an absolute guarantee) was not given by- the National Bank of Commerce of Tulsa (guarantee) to Charles T. Abbott (the guarantor). The whole question in this case is whether such notice of acceptance was necessary. That, in turn, depends upon whether there was a “mere offer of guaranty” or an “absolute guarantee,” notice being…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Davis v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Davis Sewing MacHine Co. v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- J. R. Watkins Medical Co. v. BrandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
- T. & H. Smith & Co. v. ThesmannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Oklahoma City Nat. Bank v. EzzardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.