Gladys Belle Oil Co. v. Mackey
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Oklahoma; Ralph E. Campbell, Judge. Suit by the United States against Phillip Mackey, Mary Mackey, Uovely Mackey, for himself and as guardian of Phillip Mackey and Mary Mackey, minors, Cyrus S. Avery, the Waterside Oil & Gas Company, the Gypsy Oil Company, the Texas Company (sued as the Texas Pipe Dine Company), the Gladys Belle Oil Company, Charles Stunkard, Walter Stunkard, the Pollard-Hagan…
Read the full summary
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Oklahoma; Ralph E. Campbell, Judge. Suit by the United States against Phillip Mackey, Mary Mackey, Uovely Mackey, for himself and as guardian of Phillip Mackey and Mary Mackey, minors, Cyrus S. Avery, the Waterside Oil & Gas Company, the Gypsy Oil Company, the Texas Company (sued as the Texas Pipe Dine Company), the Gladys Belle Oil Company, Charles Stunkard, Walter Stunkard, the Pollard-Hagan Oil Company, and the State of Oklahoma. From a decree (214 Fed. 137), sustaining in part a motion by defendant…
1Opinion of the Court
CARLAND, Circuit Judge.
The bill in this case was filed by the United States to quiet the title to a parcel of land in Tulsa county, Okl. Appellants, having been made defendants therein, filed an answer and also a cross-bill, making the United States and certain codefend-ants in the original suit, defendants therein.
The Pollard-Hagan Oil Company, Cyrus S. Avery, and the Waterside Oil & Gas Company demurred to the cross-bill. The United States answered the same. On July 19, 1913, the demurrers of Avery, and the Waterside Oil & Gas Company, having been brought on for hearing, were treated as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railroad v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Bostwick v. BrinkerhoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Grant v. Phoenix Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Ex Parte NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Robinson v. BeltCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Union Electric Light & Power Co. v. Snyder Estate Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- United States v. Bighorn Sheep Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
- Pierce v. National Bank of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
- States v. BroudeDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1924
- State Ex Rel. Pierce v. SkinkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1934