Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Pierce v. Skinker

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 24, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

On August 12, 1933, relators presented to this court their petition for a writ of prohibition, and on the same day the court issued its preliminary writ commanding the respondents to appear and show cause why final judgment in prohibition should not be rendered against them.

The respondents made return. Both sides filed briefs, and made oral argument at the January call, 1934, of the October term, of fhis court.

The pleadings and exhibits here presented show the following state of facts in connection with the proceedings in this case.

On January 22, 1931, the Union Electric Eight & Power…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. La BourgogneSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. St. Louis, Keokuk & Northwestern Railway Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  3. Luxton v. North River Bridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. City of Cape Girardeau v. HunzeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  5. St. Joseph Terminal Railroad v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  2. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. DeutschmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API