Legal Opinion

Navajo Nation v. MacDonald

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 23, 1994No. 1 CA-CV 92-0113PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOCI, Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Byron T. Brown and Kurion T. Tracy conspired with Peter D. MacDonald, Sr., Chairman of the Navajo Nation Tribal Council, and his son, Peter D. MacDonald, Jr. to defraud the Navajo Nation (“the Tribe”) of several million dollars through a double-escrow real estate transaction. When the Tribe discovered the existence of the illegal conspiracy, it filed a civil action against the conspirators in Maricopa County Superior Court. The trial court entered judgment in favor of the Tribe and against Brown, MacDonald, Jr., and MacDonald, Sr. 1 Peter D. “Rocky”…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Williams v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Fisher v. District Court of the Sixteenth Judicial District of MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Norman M. Littell v. Raymond NakaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  4. Francisco v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Rogus v. LordsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
  2. ASARCO LLC v. Americas Mining Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
  3. Cimarron Foothills Community Ass'n v. KippenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  4. Bailiff v. WoolmanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  5. Hung v. Genting BerhadCourt of Appeals of Nevada · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API