Legal Opinion

United States v. Frank Travis Crumbley

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided November 5, 1984No. 83-3651PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

There is only one issue on appeal in this case, i.e. whether the evidence was insufficient to sustain the appellant’s conviction for violating 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), 1 entering a federally insured bank or savings and loan with the intent to commit a felony. The defendant contends specifically that the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to establish his intent to commit any felony in the bank. 2

The appellant relies upon Prince v. United States, 352 U.S. 322, 77 S.Ct. 403, 1 L.Ed.2d 370 (1957), where the Supreme Court 'stated:

It is fair inference from the wording in the Act,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Nelson BellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  2. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Prince v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Ellis Thayer Van Nattan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  5. United States v. William Maurice Foster, Jr. And Terry Lee McCreadyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Daniel Morris Thomas v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Dept. Of Corrections, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  2. Levis Leon Aldrich v. Louie L. WainwrightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  3. James Ernest Hitchcock v. Louie L. WainwrightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  4. Levis Leon Aldrich v. Louie L. WainwrightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API