United States v. Frank Travis Crumbley
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Non-Argument Calendar.
1Per curiam
There is only one issue on appeal in this case, i.e. whether the evidence was insufficient to sustain the appellant’s conviction for violating 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), 1 entering a federally insured bank or savings and loan with the intent to commit a felony. The defendant contends specifically that the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to establish his intent to commit any felony in the bank. 2
The appellant relies upon Prince v. United States, 352 U.S. 322, 77 S.Ct. 403, 1 L.Ed.2d 370 (1957), where the Supreme Court 'stated:
It is fair inference from the wording in the Act,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Nelson BellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Prince v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Ellis Thayer Van Nattan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- United States v. William Maurice Foster, Jr. And Terry Lee McCreadyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Daniel Morris Thomas v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Dept. Of Corrections, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Levis Leon Aldrich v. Louie L. WainwrightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- James Ernest Hitchcock v. Louie L. WainwrightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Levis Leon Aldrich v. Louie L. WainwrightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985