Legal Opinion

Ellis Thayer Van Nattan v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 1, 1966No. 8368_1PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Circuit Judge.

This is a direct appeal from a conviction upon a jury verdict of guilty of unlawfully entering a federally insured bank with the intent to commit a felony affecting such bank, as defined by 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a).

Appellant makes three points here, namely (1) that the evidence upon the issue of intent was insufficient for the submission of the case to the jury, (2) prejudice because of remarks by government counsel in his closing argument, and (3) that the services of court-appointed counsel were forced upon the appellant by the trial court in violation of his rights under the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Robert Clyde Sanders v. United States of America, Joe Starr Gullahorn, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  3. Lloyd Carl Cummings v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. United States v. DoughertyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. United States v. SummersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  3. Timothy Leary v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  4. United States v. Charles P. BourassaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  5. People v. SharpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API