Legal Opinion

State v. Gerig

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 5, 2019No. A166194PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

*885Defendant appeals his convictions for first-degree rape, ORS 163.375, and first-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.427. The conduct underlying the convictions occurred at a party, while the victim was intoxicated. We affirm.

Defendant argues in his first two assignments of error that the trial court plainly erred by not instructing the jury on the rape and sexual abuse charges that it was required to find that defendant knew that the victim was incapable of consent due to physical helplessness, mental incapacity, or mental defect. In his third and fourth assignments of error, he similarly argues…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. SimonovOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. PhelpsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. State v. SpringCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. State v. NyemboCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  2. State v. CarltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  3. State v. CarltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. State v. RossiterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  5. State v. RossiterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API