Legal Opinion

Andersen v. Seattle Automobile Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1928No. 20959. Department TwoPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This case, arising out of the bailment of an automobile by appellant to respondent, upon a trial to the court and a jury resulted in a verdict for appellant in the full amount claimed, $500. Respondent had moved for dismissal at the close of appellant’s case and for a directed verdict at the close of the whole case, both of which motions were denied. After the verdict, respondent moved for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or a new trial, and the court granted the motion for a judgment n. o. v., set the verdict aside and dismissed the case. From that action of the court, the appellant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. CaughrenWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Williamson v. PhillipoffSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
  3. Shriver v. County Court of Marion CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Simonson v. HuffWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Jensen v. Shaw Show Case Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Webb v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Innocenti v. PadavichWashington Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API