Legal Opinion

Crown Communications v. Zoning Hearing Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 23, 1997No. 34 and 36 W.D. Appeal Docket 1997PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Chief Justice.

The issue in these consolidated cases is whether private business entities may be considered public utilities for zoning purposes when the applicable zoning ordinances do not define “public utility.”

Crown Communications, a sole proprietorship engaged in the business of providing facilities for wireless communications, obtained a perpetual easement from the Borough of Glenfield to construct and maintain a 375 foot communications tower and equipment shed on a residential lot measuring 100 feet by 100 feet. On or about August 3, 1994 Crown applied for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Valley View Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Abbey v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. WVCH Communications, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Taliaferro v. Darby Tp. Zoning Hearing Bd.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. C & M Developers, Inc. v. Bedminster Township Zoning Hearing BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. In Re Appeal of Realen Valley Forge Greenes AssociatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Curtis v. Board of AppealsHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Gorsline v. Bd. of Supervisors of Fairfield Twp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API