Barron v. Tate
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION DEURSLA LASHAY BARRON PLAINTIFF V. CASE NO. 3:20-cv-00188 JM CURTIS TATE DEFENDANT ORDER Plaintiff Deursla Lashay Barron, in custody at the Craighead County Detention Center, filed a pro se Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 2). She also filed an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. No. 1). Because Barron makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915, her motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 1) is GRANTED. Her Complaint, however, will be dismissed for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.