Legal Opinion

Barron v. Tate

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided July 20, 2020No. 3:20-cv-00188Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION DEURSLA LASHAY BARRON PLAINTIFF V. CASE NO. 3:20-cv-00188 JM CURTIS TATE DEFENDANT ORDER Plaintiff Deursla Lashay Barron, in custody at the Craighead County Detention Center, filed a pro se Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 2). She also filed an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. No. 1). Because Barron makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915, her motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 1) is GRANTED. Her Complaint, however, will be dismissed for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API